---
authoritative: false
representation: annotated-page
publisher: AstroKube
methodology: https://ai-act.astrokube.com/about/
source_verified_on: '2026-09-15'
site_content_updated_on: '2026-09-15'
title: Recital 61 | EU AI Act | AstroKube
description: 'Recital 61, EU AI Act: Certain AI systems intended for the administration of justice and democratic processes should be classified as high-risk…'
language: en
source: https://ai-act.astrokube.com/law/recital-61/
---

1.  [Start](https://ai-act.astrokube.com/)
2.  [The law](https://ai-act.astrokube.com/law/)
3.  Recital 61

# Recital 61

This is a recital of the 2024 act: interpretive context for the operative articles, not operative law itself.

▼ Primary text, verbatim. Our annotations appear below, visibly separated.

Certain AI systems intended for the administration of justice and democratic processes should be classified as high-risk, considering their potentially significant impact on democracy, the rule of law, individual freedoms as well as the right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial. In particular, to address the risks of potential biases, errors and opacity, it is appropriate to qualify as high-risk AI systems intended to be used by a judicial authority or on its behalf to assist judicial authorities in researching and interpreting facts and the law and in applying the law to a concrete set of facts. AI systems intended to be used by alternative dispute resolution bodies for those purposes should also be considered to be high-risk when the outcomes of the alternative dispute resolution proceedings produce legal effects for the parties. The use of AI tools can support the decision-making power of judges or judicial independence, but should not replace it: the final decision-making must remain a human-driven activity. The classification of AI systems as high-risk should not, however, extend to AI systems intended for purely ancillary administrative activities that do not affect the actual administration of justice in individual cases, such as anonymisation or pseudonymisation of judicial decisions, documents or data, communication between personnel, administrative tasks.

This text is meant purely as a documentation tool and has no legal effect. The Union's institutions do not assume any liability for its contents. The authentic versions of the relevant acts, including their preambles, are those published in the Official Journal of the European Union and available in EUR-Lex.

## If you would rather not read the law

The basics page explains the Regulation's own categories in order: scope, role, tier, date. The engineering view groups the obligations by the platform capability they demand.

[Start with the basics →](https://ai-act.astrokube.com/basics/) [Open the engineering view →](https://ai-act.astrokube.com/engineering/)

## About this provision

### Type

Recital

### Amended by

Not amended

### Cited capture

regulation-2024-1689/en-2026-08-18.html sha256 8f0b656302f9864c…

[Authentic text (EUR-Lex) →](http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj) [This version (EUR-Lex) →](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32024R1689)

### Machine readable

[/law/recital-61.md](https://ai-act.astrokube.com/law/recital-61.md) [/api/law.json](https://ai-act.astrokube.com/api/law.json)

### Found an error?

[Write to us →](https://astrokube.com/contact)